A lot of them were articulated, so all credits goes to Bandai for their unique design.Īm I too strict with the rating here? I was looking for cool gimmicks or “open hatch” features, but there weren’t any. I had a lot of fun moving the arms and legs. Seriously, the only hindrances here are the tight pegs. And the inner frame itself shares a remarkable range of movement. I saw a lot of movable parts because of the design from its inner frame. To me, the limited range of movement from the ball joint peg on the waist and on the legs were just minor ones. At least, this gives you the option of adding the extra detailing yourself. It can’t be helped though because the PG WZC was released earlier before the RG WZC. Of course, it would have been nice if it also got the same treatment from the RG’s detailing. Well there were more added detailing here in the Perfect Grade line when compared to its MG version. The metal parts on the legs were fine as long as you tighten the screws very well. Some of them don’t fit together like you’ve seen in the waist. I may have some trouble with the wirings but it was fun and became a new experience for me as well.Īnother issue to take note of are the metal parts. I also trimmed/sanded some of those pegs to make sure they fit well. Well I did mention that there were several tight parts, but not all of them are like that and they didn’t pose any difficulty for me. I love Wing Gundam Zero Custom, but because of the issues here in its plastic quality, I had no choice but to give a six. I don’t have any new X-Acto blades so it led to visible stress marks. AsideĪnd because the parts were larger, the gates were also large. The parts weren’t glossy but they were not much of a big deal for me if you have patience in sanding them or using any nail buffers. If you recall the images on the Arm Unit, there were round nubs and I saw a lot of them. But usually, I don’t notice them quickly in the construction manual.Īs a start, the molding is bad. I sometimes forget that they are still on the runners. Please be advised that some of the pieces on each “parts exploded view” might be missing. If there are also any errors on the terminologies used, please do correct me. And if there are any errors (spelling, grammar), please do mention them on the comments section. Some parts here do have visible nub marks and it’s actually my fault because I have cut the nubs a little close to the part’s surface. Again, I apologize for the fuzzy camera shots and I will try to get more lighting materials in the future. I would like to say that there might be several issues I haven’t found during assembly, mostly because I had a smooth run on most of the parts.
Well for me it is generally meant for high-speed movements in air even though it can still do battle on the ground.Īnyways, I hope this short review will be able to help you guys who are planning to get this kit or if you already have one but still having doubts about the issues.
Wing Zero looks nicer in an action base and it’s supposed to be like that because the Wing Gundam Zero Custom is an aerial MS. That means they must’ve created the action base or base stand to be a “separate purchase” item and that’s one thing I hate about Bandai. The other concern for me is that Bandai didn’t design this kit to be released with an action base. Fortunately, not all of those expectations were true and I had fun with this kit. I also took note that it’s from TT Hongli so there might be flashes, rough surfaces, dimples, and the other half of a certain piece is misaligned. And I will probably get a lot of hard time assembling the whole model. My impression is that I am expecting few runners and simple inner frame design for this kit. This is my third PG review and it’s from the Gundam Wing series. ALL IMAGES ARE LINKED TO THEIR ORIGINAL SIZE. A lot of people probably thought the images are small. I have been doing this since my first post. () UPDATE: You can click the images to show the original size and to give you a better look.
0 kommentar(er)
